beyed all the rules of probation if allowed.
The second to testify on her behalf was Barbara Boggs who had known Rebecca Keener for 18 years, and had her children in pre-K. She was very concerned about the mental health of Rebecca’s eight year old son should Rebecca be incarcerated.
Attorney Balenovich defended his client saying that she was an excellent candidate for probation; having followed all rules while out on bond and continued working in her home care position. He too mentioned her 8 year old son and 2 year old granddaughter that she helped care for as well as the care for her father. Balenovich said that this was her first felony and that by allowing her to be out of prison she could work to repay the money owed for her crime. He noted that her crime was not one of violence and that he had told her that if she was allowed the privilege of probation she would go to prison if she broke the rules. He was confident she could follow the rules and remain in compliance.
Prosecuting Attorney Nigel Jeffries stood silent without recommendation.
Rebecca was given an opportunity to speak for herself at which time she told the judge “This is a mistake, I didn’t do it intentionally and I’m very sorry. Thank you.”
A pre-sentence report was provided by Alicia Lawson, Probation officer which had been reviewed by Judge Ashley. The Judge told Mrs. Keener “You saying that it wasn’t intentionally done, doesn’t make sense.” Judge Ashley then placed her in the custody of the Sheriff and remanded her to the Central Regional Jail for a 60 day evaluation. She was also ordered to pay $1,963.00 restitution and told that at the end of the evaluation period it would be determined if she were a good candidate for community corrections.
.
