Government Guest Writers News Op-Ed

Controversy Surrounds Courthouse Elevator Grant Denial


Calhoun County residents are raising questions about the lack of support for a grant to install an elevator at the courthouse, a project that would improve accessibility and ensure compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). While the Calhoun County Commission and Sheriff’s Office signed letters in favor of the elevator, other elected officials did not offer their support, leading to the grant’s denial.
According to Commissioner Eric Lupardus, the Commission and Sheriff Knight collaborated on a letter advocating for the elevator, which was circulated to all elected county officials for their signatures. Despite follow-up emails from the County Administrator, not all officials signed the letter. Lupardus revealed that the Circuit Clerk’s office not only declined to sign but also wrote a separate letter opposing the elevator. Efforts to obtain a copy of this letter have been unsuccessful, as the Circuit Clerk has not responded to requests, possibly due to an incorrect email address.

The County Clerk’s office also did not sign the letter, though they denied having written an opposition letter. Lupardus stated that the lack of internal support from elected officials was cited as a reason for the grant’s rejection.

The decision has sparked frustration among community members, with many questioning why any official would oppose a project aimed at improving accessibility. Denise Bunner expressed disbelief, stating, “Who would not want a grant? I know it doesn’t cover all expenses most of the time…but dang.” Others, like Jo Ann Yeager Parsons, suggested alternative solutions, such as moving services to the ground floor for those unable to climb stairs.

The issue has also raised concerns about transparency, with residents demanding to know which officials opposed the elevator and their reasons for doing so. Gaylen Duskey, editor of the Calhoun Chronicle, has publicly called for clarity on the matter, asking, “Who actively worked against the elevator and why?”

As the community continues to seek answers, the lack of an elevator remains a barrier for many residents, highlighting the need for greater accountability and collaboration among elected officials.



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *